Hi Jason,
On 23.04.2013 14:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 22.04.2013 17:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/10/2009 08:33 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
> > Attached are my latest experimental polymorphic lambda patches
> > against the latest lambda branch.
>
> Polymorphic lambdas were voted in for C++14 at
On 04/22/2013 12:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The proposal will be at
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3649.html
It's now been posted at http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N3649.html
Jason
On 08/10/2009 08:33 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Attached are my latest experimental polymorphic lambda patches against the
latest lambda branch.
Polymorphic lambdas were voted in for C++14 at the meeting this past
week; are you interested in resuming this work?
The proposal will be at
http:/
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> A few comments:
>
>> /* XXX: Any way to get current location? */
>
> input_location
Just a late comment: using input_location is generally not a good
idea. Every token in the parser has a location. That should be the
source of all location
On 08/11/2009 11:20 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Ah okay. Would it be worth enhancing the tree-vec interface to include block
reallocation with size doubling and end
marking to allow for more efficient reallocation?
I don't think so; I expect that would end up being less space-efficient,
since in
Thanks for the feedback.
Jason Merrill wrote:
>Adam Butcher wrote:
>> The following examples produce
>> equivalent functions:
>>
>>1. [] (auto x, auto& y, auto const& z) { return x + y + z; }
>>2. [] (X x, Y& y, Z const& z) {
>> return x + y + z; }
>>3. [] (auto x, Y& y, auto
A few comments:
/* XXX: Any way to get current location? */
input_location
The following examples produce
equivalent functions:
1. [] (auto x, auto& y, auto const& z) { return x + y + z; }
2. [] (X x, Y& y, Z const& z) {
return x + y + z; }
3. [] (auto x, Y& y, auto const&
Attached are my latest experimental polymorphic lambda patches against the
latest lambda branch. Template parameters
implied by auto in the lambda's call parameter list no longer lose qualifiers.
The following examples produce
equivalent functions:
1. [] (auto x, auto& y, auto const& z) {
