Re: [graphite] Get graphite backend working again [scalar variable handling]

2008-08-21 Thread Albert Cohen
Tobias Grosser wrote: > (...) > Why is there a need to name the new ones like the old ones? The only > reason I can think about is debugging. And I am not sure if their exists > a strong relation between old an new ones, that makes it reasonable to > call them identical. During all the code motion,

Re: [graphite] Get graphite backend working again [scalar variable handling]

2008-08-20 Thread Tobias Grosser
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:10 +0200, Albert Cohen wrote: > Tobias Grosser wrote: > > I would like to improve the way how we handle scalar variables and ivs > > during graphite transformation. > > I am not sure, if I got it right and where to put my code in the backend. > > So it would be great, if y

Re: [graphite] Get graphite backend working again [scalar variable handling]

2008-08-20 Thread Albert Cohen
Tobias Grosser wrote: > I would like to improve the way how we handle scalar variables and ivs > during graphite transformation. > I am not sure, if I got it right and where to put my code in the backend. > So it would be great, if you could read over my ideas. > > The problem: > > In

RE: [graphite] Get graphite backend working again [scalar variable handling]

2008-08-18 Thread Tobias Grosser
Hi Jan, On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 17:37 -0500, Sjodin, Jan wrote: > > As the current code generation does not support conditional > > statements, > > we fail to generate code for them. > > > > Who will work on that one? > > I am working on this. Great! I would like to improve the way how we han