Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem

2006-01-09 Thread Andrew MacLeod
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 08:22 +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > However, it still remains true that the code path > I referred to is wrong and if, as you say, it can > never be taken, it should just be removed and > replaced with an assertion codifying w

Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem

2006-01-08 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > > this can never happen. Note that is_real_op = is_gimple_reg (var), and > a call clobbered variable can never satisfy is_gimple_reg. Most likely > you forget to set TREE_ADDRESSABLE for this variable. Or it gets to > call_cl

Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem

2006-01-08 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > While trying to debug a long-standing ICE on the > gcjx branch, I have found out that the root cause > of the problem is with the tree-ssa operands processing > code and it still seems to exist on the mainline > (as of revision 109471), though I have traced the code > path in a debugger

[gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem

2006-01-08 Thread Ranjit Mathew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, While trying to debug a long-standing ICE on the gcjx branch, I have found out that the root cause of the problem is with the tree-ssa operands processing code and it still seems to exist on the mainline (as of revision 109471), though I have tr