On 17/01/2024 23:52, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 15:44 +0100, Pierrick Philippe wrote:
>> Hi David, hi all,
> Hi Pierrick.
First, thanks for you answer.
[stripping]
> I confess that I've been quite sloppy in places with types in the
> analyzer, keeping track of them when it's easy,
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 17:52 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 15:44 +0100, Pierrick Philippe wrote:
> > Hi David, hi all,
>
> Hi Pierrick.
>
> >
> > I was playing along with APIs from the Static Analyzer and
> > encountered a
> > segfault in gcc/tree.cc:5068 (i.e. in function b
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 15:44 +0100, Pierrick Philippe wrote:
> Hi David, hi all,
Hi Pierrick.
>
> I was playing along with APIs from the Static Analyzer and
> encountered a
> segfault in gcc/tree.cc:5068 (i.e. in function build2 and failure is
> due
> to a
> gcc_assert call), after a call to
> an
Hi David, hi all,
I was playing along with APIs from the Static Analyzer and encountered a
segfault in gcc/tree.cc:5068 (i.e. in function build2 and failure is due
to a
gcc_assert call), after a call to
ana::region_model::get_representative_tree.
>From my debugging of the problem, I realized that
