Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-12 Thread Chen Gang
On 09/13/2013 01:02 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: > 2013/9/13 Chen Gang : >> > On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >> On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >>> Hello all: >>> > [...] >>> currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other >>> bugs may dupl

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-12 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/9/13 Chen Gang : > On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >>> Hello all: >>> [...] >>> currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other >>> bugs may duplicate with these bugs, so I do not send (if they are also >>> valuable, I

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-12 Thread Chen Gang
On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >> Hello all: >> >> I have send the related issues to "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla";, please >> check if you like, thanks. >> >> currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other >> bugs may dupl

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello all: > > I have send the related issues to "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla";, please > check if you like, thanks. > > currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other > bugs may duplicate with these bugs, so I do not send (if the

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-11 Thread Chen Gang
Hello all: I have send the related issues to "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla";, please check if you like, thanks. currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other bugs may duplicate with these bugs, so I do not send (if they are also valuable, I will send too). Next, I should

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-10 Thread Chen Gang
On 09/11/2013 03:55 AM, Michael Schewe wrote: > Hello Maintainers, > > if you like to drop h8/300 support in linux kernel, thats OK for me. OK, thanks. > But i like to see it still supported in gcc & binutils, at least i have > some projects and know companies using this architecture in embedded

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-10 Thread Michael Schewe
Hello Maintainers, if you like to drop h8/300 support in linux kernel, thats OK for me. But i like to see it still supported in gcc & binutils, at least i have some projects and know companies using this architecture in embedded applications, bare metal without OS. These products have lifetime i

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-09 Thread Chen Gang
On 09/10/2013 10:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/09/2013 07:13 PM, Chen Gang wrote: >> Hello Maintainers: >> >> After google search and check the Linux kernel, H8/300 is dead, and for >> gcc-4.9.0 and binutils-2.23.2 still has h8300, do we still need it for >> another OS ? >> >> Welcome any suggesti

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/09/2013 07:13 PM, Chen Gang wrote: Hello Maintainers: After google search and check the Linux kernel, H8/300 is dead, and for gcc-4.9.0 and binutils-2.23.2 still has h8300, do we still need it for another OS ? Welcome any suggestions or completions, thanks. The related information in li

[Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

2013-09-09 Thread Chen Gang
Hello Maintainers: After google search and check the Linux kernel, H8/300 is dead, and for gcc-4.9.0 and binutils-2.23.2 still has h8300, do we still need it for another OS ? Welcome any suggestions or completions, thanks. The related information in linux kernel next tree: commit d02babe847b