On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the comments.
>>>
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
> Constructing variable-len
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the comments.
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
Constructing variable-length vectors
Curr
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> Constructing variable-length vectors
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently both tree and rtl vector const
Thanks for the comments.
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> Constructing variable-length vectors
>>
>>
>> Currently both tree and rtl vector constants require the number of
>> elements to be known at compile time and
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> As described in the covering note, one of big differences for SVE is that
> things like mode sizes, offsets, and numbers of vector elements can depend
> on a runtime parameter. This message describes how the SVE patches handle
> that and
As described in the covering note, one of big differences for SVE is that
things like mode sizes, offsets, and numbers of vector elements can depend
on a runtime parameter. This message describes how the SVE patches handle
that and how they deal with vector constants in which the number of element
