Re: [RFD+PATCH] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform

2012-06-12 Thread Pedro Alves
On 06/11/2012 07:20 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > From the ChangeLog entry, it seems like Pedro was involved in the making > of that patch, so perhaps he could be a good reviewer? All involvement I recall was updating a couple lines to new interfaces in the context of a merge from upstream. All e

Re: [RFD+PATCH] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform

2012-06-11 Thread Joel Brobecker
> I propose therefore to accept the existing inconsistencies and deal > with them entirely within GDB. I have figured out that the ISA bit > lost in various places can still be recovered as long as we have > symbol information -- that'll have the st_other attribute correctly > set to one of s

Re: [RFD+PATCH] ISA bit treatment on the MIPS platform

2012-05-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hello again, As promised I am providing Linux results now. With the recent fixes to gdbserver and mips-linux-tdep the number of Linux progressions matches, as far as the order of magnitude is concerned, that of bare-iron ones and is around 30 for MIPS16 and around 100 for microMIPS multilibs.