Re: [RFC] c++, libstdc++: Default make check vs. tests for newest C++ standard

2022-10-19 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On 10/19/22 04:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default testing. Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?), make check-g++ tests by default { 98, 14, 17,

Re: [RFC] c++, libstdc++: Default make check vs. tests for newest C++ standard

2022-10-19 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 09:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather > than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default > testing. > Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?), That's the default un

[RFC] c++, libstdc++: Default make check vs. tests for newest C++ standard

2022-10-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Hi! The screw-up on my side with libstdc++ testing (tested normally rather than in C++23 mode) makes me wonder if we couldn't tweak the default testing. Dunno what libstdc++ testing normally does (just C++17?), make check-g++ tests by default { 98, 14, 17, 20 } (and I regularly use GXX_TESTSUITE_S