On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > I find it highly unlikely though that the writers will (be able to) chase
> > individual targets and any obscure hardware-dependent options the targets
> > may provide. And we cannot expect people compiling software to be
>
> What that says to me i
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> I find it highly unlikely though that the writers will (be able to) chase
> individual targets and any obscure hardware-dependent options the targets
> may provide. And we cannot expect people compiling software to be
What that says to me is tha
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > The target audience for the `-mieee=strict' option is in my idea a
> > non-technical user, say a physicist, who does not necessarily know or is
> > fluent with the guts of computer hardware and who has the need to build
> > and reliably run their so
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> The target audience for the `-mieee=strict' option is in my idea a
> non-technical user, say a physicist, who does not necessarily know or is
> fluent with the guts of computer hardware and who has the need to build
> and reliably run their softw
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Any or all of these options may have effects beyond propagating the IEEE
> > Std 754 compliance mode down to the assembler and the linker. In
> > particular `-mieee=strict' is expected to guarantee code generated to
> > fully comply to IEEE Std 754 ra
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Any or all of these options may have effects beyond propagating the IEEE
> Std 754 compliance mode down to the assembler and the linker. In
> particular `-mieee=strict' is expected to guarantee code generated to
> fully comply to IEEE Std 754 rathe
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > 3.3.2 Static Linking Object Acceptance Rules
> >
> > The static linker shall follow the user selection as to the linking mode
> > used, either of `strict' and `relaxed'. The selection will be made
> > according to the usual way assumed for the environ
> 3.3.2 Static Linking Object Acceptance Rules
>
> The static linker shall follow the user selection as to the linking mode
> used, either of `strict' and `relaxed'. The selection will be made
> according to the usual way assumed for the environment used, which may be
> a command-line option, a p
Dear fellow developers,
On behalf of Imagination Technologies I would like to introduce the
following ABI extension to create a compatibility solution for opposing
NaN encodings. I will appreciate your feedback and will happily answer
any questions and address any concerns you may have.
A c
