Richard Sandiford writes:
> Sam James writes:
>> Richard Sandiford writes:
>>
>>> Sam James via Gcc writes:
Hi!
This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
writing an RFC.
>>> [...]
TL;DR: The proposal is:
1) MAINTAINERS should list a field c
Sam James writes:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>
>> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>>> writing an RFC.
>>>
>> [...]
>>> TL;DR: The proposal is:
>>>
>>> 1) MAINTAINERS should list a field containing either the gcc.gnu.org
>>> email
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>> writing an RFC.
>>
> [...]
>> TL;DR: The proposal is:
>>
>> 1) MAINTAINERS should list a field containing either the gcc.gnu.org
>> email in full, or their gcc username (
Sam James via Gcc writes:
> Hi!
>
> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> writing an RFC.
>
> What?
> ---
>
> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> adding an extra field for their GCC/sourceware account:
>account>
> Joe Bloggs
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> On 25/06/2024 20:08, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>>> [snip]
I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing
that the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
email.
Hi,
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>>> writing an RFC.
>>>
>>> What?
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modifi
Sam James via Gcc writes:
> Gerald Pfeifer writes:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
1) MAINTAINERS should list a field containing either the gcc.gnu.org
email in full, or their gcc username (bikeshedding semi-welcome);
>>> I like the proposal. I'd say it should
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Sam James wrote:
>>> Now, a bigger question: Why would anyone need to know my gcc.gnu.org
>>> username (or e-mail address) in the Bugzilla context?
>> Isn't it answered in the original proposal? It makes CCing the committer
>> of a bisect result way
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Sam James wrote:
>> Now, a bigger question: Why would anyone need to know my gcc.gnu.org
>> username (or e-mail address) in the Bugzilla context?
> Isn't it answered in the original proposal? It makes CCing the committer
> of a bisect result way easier.
No, it's not. And no,
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>>> 1) MAINTAINERS should list a field containing either the gcc.gnu.org
>>> email in full, or their gcc username (bikeshedding semi-welcome);
>> I like the proposal. I'd say it should be fine to just put the gcc
>> user
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>> 1) MAINTAINERS should list a field containing either the gcc.gnu.org
>> email in full, or their gcc username (bikeshedding semi-welcome);
> I like the proposal. I'd say it should be fine to just put the gcc
> username (without the @gcc.gnu.org
On 25/06/2024 20:08, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
>> [snip]
>>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing
>>> that the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
>>> email. This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>>
On 27/06/2024 13:29, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
>
>> On 24/06/2024 22:34, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>>> writing an RFC.
>>>
>>> What?
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to
On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>> writing an RFC.
>>
>> What?
>> ---
>>
>> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
>> adding an extra field for their
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 13:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
wrote:
>
> On 24/06/2024 22:34, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> > writing an RFC.
> >
> > What?
> > ---
> >
> > I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> On 24/06/2024 22:34, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
>> writing an RFC.
>>
>> What?
>> ---
>>
>> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
>> adding an extra field for their GCC/s
On 24/06/2024 22:34, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> writing an RFC.
>
> What?
> ---
>
> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> adding an extra field for their GCC/sourceware account:
>a
Arsen Arsenović writes:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
>> [snip]
>>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing
>>> that the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
>>> email. This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>>
>>> $ git config committer
Hi,
Thomas Koenig via Gcc writes:
> Am 25.06.24 um 21:08 schrieb Arsen Arsenović via Gcc:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>
>>> I'd welcome this - care to create a patch for
>>> contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh?
>> Sure - I've attached a partial patch. I didn't find the hook which runs
>> on each
Am 25.06.24 um 21:08 schrieb Arsen Arsenović via Gcc:
Richard Biener writes:
I'd welcome this - care to create a patch for
contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh?
Sure - I've attached a partial patch. I didn't find the hook which runs
on each push to check commits, so the current patch is minim
Hi,
Richard Biener writes:
> [snip]
>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing
>> that the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
>> email. This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>
>> $ git config committer.email @gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> Git has supp
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 10:06, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Stubbs writes:
>
> > On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
> >> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
> >> the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:36 AM Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> > writing an RFC.
> >
> > What?
> > ---
> >
> > I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> > adding an
On 25/06/2024 10:05, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Stubbs writes:
On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
This can be configured repo-l
Hi,
Andrew Stubbs writes:
> On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
>> I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
>> the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
>> This can be configured repo-locally via:
>>$ git config commit
On 24/06/2024 23:34, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote:
I was also proposing (and would like to re-air that here) enforcing that
the committer field of each commit is a (valid) @gcc.gnu.org email.
This can be configured repo-locally via:
$ git config committer.email @gcc.gnu.org
Git has supporte
Hi,
Sam James via Gcc writes:
> Hi!
>
> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> writing an RFC.
>
> What?
> ---
>
> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> adding an extra field for their GCC/sourceware account:
>account>
> Joe
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 22:35, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
> writing an RFC.
>
> What?
> ---
>
> I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
> adding an extra field for their GCC/sourceware account:
>
Hi!
This comes up in #gcc on IRC every so often, so finally
writing an RFC.
What?
---
I propose that MAINTAINERS be modified to be of the form,
adding an extra field for their GCC/sourceware account:
Joe Bloggsjoeblo...@example.com jblo...@gcc.gnu.org
Further,
29 matches
Mail list logo
