Re: [RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering

2020-08-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 07:41:54PM +, Tamar Christina wrote: > While I would agree that it's fundamentally more restrictive than an > object based one I wouldn't say it's useless. At the very least it gives > us something to build on later. It is IMHO useless and has also very undesirable dir

Re: [RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering

2020-08-20 Thread Erick Ochoa
stina ; Kevin Smith ; Gary Oblock ; Richard Biener ; Martin Jambor ; Jan Hubicka ; Ashok Bhat ; mli...@suse.cz; Kyrylo Tkachov Subject: [RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering Hello again, I have committed a couple of changes to the branch refs/vendors/ARM/heads/arm-struct

RE: [RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering

2020-08-20 Thread Tamar Christina
in Smith > ; Gary Oblock > ; Richard Biener > ; Martin Jambor ; Jan > Hubicka ; Ashok Bhat ; > mli...@suse.cz; Kyrylo Tkachov > Subject: [RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering > > Hello again, > > I have committed a couple of changes to th

[RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering

2020-08-17 Thread Erick Ochoa
Hello again, I have committed a couple of changes to the branch refs/vendors/ARM/heads/arm-struct-reorg-wip where my transformations are currently residing. This week I'll be working on fixing several warnings and fuzzying these passes. 2020-08-17 Erick Ochoa * Can be bootstrapped

[RFC] LTO Dead Field Elimination and LTO Field Reordering

2020-08-11 Thread Erick Ochoa
Hello again, Thanks for replying to my previous thread. I am thankful for all input received and addressed the comments which I could address. I have been working on the past two weeks on fixing the style and adding comments explaining classes and families of functions. I have also added a pr