Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end

2005-08-23 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While researching who is really using flow's computed LOG_LINKS, I > found > a define_split in the rs6000 back-end that uses them through > find_single_use. It turns out the only users are combine, this split, > and a function in regmove. See also: ht

Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end

2005-08-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
David Edelsohn wrote: Paolo Bonzini writes: Paolo> I'm testing a patch that does this replacement, and I can post it Paolo> tomorrow morning. It has triggered only a dozen times so far (half in Paolo> libgcc, half in the compiler), but it may be worth keeping it. It w

Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end

2005-08-22 Thread David Edelsohn
> Paolo Bonzini writes: Paolo> I'm testing a patch that does this replacement, and I can post it Paolo> tomorrow morning. It has triggered only a dozen times so far (half in Paolo> libgcc, half in the compiler), but it may be worth keeping it. It would be nice to keep this type of

[RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end

2005-08-22 Thread Paolo Bonzini
While researching who is really using flow's computed LOG_LINKS, I found a define_split in the rs6000 back-end that uses them through find_single_use. It turns out the only users are combine, this split, and a function in regmove. The split dates back to revision 1.5 of old-gcc. ;; If we are