On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 12:57 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Kugan
> wrote:
> > On 17/06/13 19:07, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Kugan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am attempting to fix Bug 43721 - Failure to optimise (a/b) and (a%b)
> >>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Kugan
wrote:
> On 17/06/13 19:07, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Kugan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am attempting to fix Bug 43721 - Failure to optimise (a/b) and (a%b)
>>> into
>>> single __aeabi_idivmod call
>>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
On 17/06/13 19:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Kugan wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to fix Bug 43721 - Failure to optimise (a/b) and (a%b) into
single __aeabi_idivmod call
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43721)
execute_cse_sincos tree level pass does similar cse so I a
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Kugan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am attempting to fix Bug 43721 - Failure to optimise (a/b) and (a%b) into
> single __aeabi_idivmod call
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43721)
>
> execute_cse_sincos tree level pass does similar cse so I attempted to use
> similar appr
Hi,
I am attempting to fix Bug 43721 - Failure to optimise (a/b) and (a%b)
into single __aeabi_idivmod call
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43721)
execute_cse_sincos tree level pass does similar cse so I attempted to
use similar approach here. Div/mod cse is not really using bui
