Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-19 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On 6/17/23 10:43, Ben Boeckel wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 23:55:53 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: I see the same thing with patch 4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, e.g. FAIL: g++.dg/modules/ben-1_a.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /home/jason/gt/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/ben-1_a.

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-17 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 23:55:53 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > I see the same thing with patch 4 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, e.g. > > FAIL: g++.dg/modules/ben-1_a.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > /home/jason/gt/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/ben-1_a.C:9:1: internal > compiler err

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-16 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:49 PM Ben Boeckel wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 21:59:13 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > This patch series causes ICEs on arm-linux-gnueabihf. Would you > > please investigate? Please let me know if you need any in reproducing > > these. > > Finally back at it. I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-16 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 15:48:59 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 21:59:13 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > This patch series causes ICEs on arm-linux-gnueabihf. Would you > > please investigate? Please let me know if you need any in reproducing > > these. > > Finally back at

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-16 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 21:59:13 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > This patch series causes ICEs on arm-linux-gnueabihf. Would you > please investigate? Please let me know if you need any in reproducing > these. Finally back at it. I tried on aarch64, but wasn't able to reproduce the errors (alas,

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-08 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc
> On Jun 7, 2023, at 00:50, Ben Boeckel via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > Hi, > > This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a > format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on > the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is > no

[PATCH v6 0/4] P1689R5 support

2023-06-06 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Hi, This patch series adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not embarrassingly parallel and need to be ordered to ensure that `import some_modul