Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:29:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Well, libtool-2.2.6 is finally released (twice even).
>>>
Actual approval depends on your answer to this question, but the patch is
technically okay. Can you commit it to the src repository too? T
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:29:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > Well, libtool-2.2.6 is finally released (twice even).
> >
> >> Actual approval depends on your answer to this question, but the patch is
> >> technically okay. Can you commit it to the src repository too? There is
> >> some r
> Well, libtool-2.2.6 is finally released (twice even).
>
>> Actual approval depends on your answer to this question, but the patch is
>> technically okay. Can you commit it to the src repository too? There is
>> some regeneration to do there too.
>
> I know that GCC is now in stage 3, and th
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:29:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:02:05PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>> Yes, I tried it also -
>>> http://pogma.com/misc/gcc-libtool-git20080810.patch (Slight change to
>>> ltgcc.m4, otherwise git libto
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:02:05PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Yes, I tried it also -
http://pogma.com/misc/gcc-libtool-git20080810.patch (Slight change to
ltgcc.m4, otherwise git libtool + generated files).
I plan on testing more widely next weekend and proposing a patch
