Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Test compat _Complex varargs passing

2016-09-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/08/2016 02:53 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote: It looks that different handling of _Complex char, _Complex short and _Complex float is there on purpose. Is (was?) there a limitation in a c language standard

Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Test compat _Complex varargs passing

2016-09-12 Thread Mike Stump
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> >>> It looks that different handling of _Complex char, _Complex short and >>> _Complex float is there on purpose. Is (was?) there a limitation in a

[PATCH, testsuite]: Test compat _Complex varargs passing

2016-09-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote: > >> It looks that different handling of _Complex char, _Complex short and >> _Complex float is there on purpose. Is (was?) there a limitation in a >> c language standard that prevents passing of these arg