Re: [LLVMdev] updated code size comparison

2012-05-07 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
On 17 December 2009 21:53, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Dec 16, 2009, at 1:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 12/16/2009 03:21 AM, John Regehr wrote: >>> Hopefully the results are more fair and useful now.  Again, feedback is >>> appreciated. >> >> I would also avoid testcases using volatile.  Small

Re: [LLVMdev] updated code size comparison

2009-12-17 Thread Bill Wendling
On Dec 16, 2009, at 1:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/16/2009 03:21 AM, John Regehr wrote: >> Hopefully the results are more fair and useful now. Again, feedback is >> appreciated. > > I would also avoid testcases using volatile. Smaller code on these > testcases is often a sign of miscomp