Re: [GSoC] generation of Gimple loops with empty bodies

2014-07-17 Thread Tobias Grosser
On 16/07/2014 11:40, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: This is not a patch review, lets move this to gcc@gcc.gnu.org. On 15/07/2014 17:03, Roman Gareev wrote: I've found out that int128_integer_type_node and long_long_integer_type_node are NULL at

Re: [GSoC] generation of Gimple loops with empty bodies

2014-07-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > This is not a patch review, lets move this to gcc@gcc.gnu.org. > > > On 15/07/2014 17:03, Roman Gareev wrote: >> >> I've found out that int128_integer_type_node and >> long_long_integer_type_node are NULL at the moment of definition of >> th

Re: [GSoC] generation of Gimple loops with empty bodies

2014-07-15 Thread Tobias Grosser
This is not a patch review, lets move this to gcc@gcc.gnu.org. On 15/07/2014 17:03, Roman Gareev wrote: I've found out that int128_integer_type_node and long_long_integer_type_node are NULL at the moment of definition of the graphite_expression_size_type. Maybe we should use long_long_integer_ty