On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a patch in my tree that employs the constexpr keyword in most of the
> places in the library where it is required in n3000. This patch bootstraps
> and causes no new regressions on MacOS at least.
Greetings,
I have a patch in my tree that employs the constexpr keyword in most of
the places in the library where it is required in n3000. This patch
bootstraps and causes no new regressions on MacOS at least. I still
need test cases.
My question is this: Is constexpr in good enough shape
