Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes!

2005-05-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 20 May 2005 16:05, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been waiting for > 15 minutes for 'jules' to unlock the library: > > how is this even possible? Are there operations taking *so* much time? > > Tagging a branch. I don't think it was

Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes!

2005-05-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been waiting for > 15 minutes for 'jules' to unlock the library: > how is this even possible? Are there operations taking *so* much time? > Is there something I can do in such cases? The process is now finished. It was, I believe, a merge to csl

Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes!

2005-05-20 Thread Paolo Carlini
Paul Brook wrote: >On Friday 20 May 2005 16:05, Paolo Carlini wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I have been waiting for > 15 minutes for 'jules' to unlock the library: >>how is this even possible? Are there operations taking *so* much time? >> >> >Tagging a branch. > > I see. I have only experience wi

Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes!

2005-05-20 Thread Paul Brook
On Friday 20 May 2005 16:05, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > I have been waiting for > 15 minutes for 'jules' to unlock the library: > how is this even possible? Are there operations taking *so* much time? Tagging a branch. See previous discussions about moving to Subversion. I believe this is cu

'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes!

2005-05-20 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, I have been waiting for > 15 minutes for 'jules' to unlock the library: how is this even possible? Are there operations taking *so* much time? Is there something I can do in such cases? Thanks in advance for any clarification, Paolo.