Re: [Draft] GSoC 2025 Proposal: Implementing Clang's -ftime-trace Feature in GCC

2025-04-04 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
On Thursday, April 3rd, 2025 at 10:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 07:21:47AM +0300, Eldar Kusdavletov wrote: > > > Thanks. I’ve submitted a more concrete version of the proposal — attaching > > it > > here. > > > > I’ve taken a brief look at Clang’s implementation, b

Re: lambda coding style

2024-01-10 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
On Wednesday, January 10th, 2024 at 7:34 PM, Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote: > > > On 1/10/24 16:41, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 04:24:42PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > On 1/10/24 15:59, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:58:03P

Re: Stage 4 date

2024-01-07 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
On Sunday, January 7th, 2024 at 3:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:12:32PM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > > On 1/7/24 08:48, waffl3x via Gcc wrote: > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline > > > Th

Stage 4 date

2024-01-07 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline The date for stage 4 is listed as the 8th on here, is that date final? There is at least 1 patch pending (mine) that is complete but Jason Merril hasn't been active for a few days. He had expressed to me that he expected the date to be next week on the 14th

Re: contributor guidelines

2023-12-04 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
On Monday, December 4th, 2023 at 5:37 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:19, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was asked to post a patch for a bugzilla PR to gcc-patches@. Two questions > > regarding https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing : > > > >

Re: wishlist: support for shorter pointers

2023-06-28 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
> Hmm... that's disappointing :( nothing was generated. Function templates are not functions, they are templates of functions, they will not generate any code unless they are instantiated. > then again. I've noticed that you've changed pointers to indices. No, I changed pointers to a template typ

Re: wishlist: support for shorter pointers

2023-06-28 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
Here's a quick and dirty example of how this function could be rewritten with modern C++. I omitted some necessary details, particularly the implementation of the linked list iterator. I also wrote it out quickly so I can't be certain it's 100% correct, but it should give you an idea of whats pos

Re: wishlist: support for shorter pointers

2023-06-28 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
>This is from just one source file, which otherwise is "plain C". If I >was to put it into a library that use "asm tweaked fancy pointers", a >portable fragment of code becomes "target dedicated" - this is undesired. I sympathize with your desire to not lock your codebase to a particular target, I

Re: wishlist: support for shorter pointers

2023-06-27 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
I want to preface this stating that I have little to no experience in compiler development, I am only merely just getting into it. With that said, I have messed around with library design a fair amount, and this seems like something that could be implemented in a library. It might be slightly comf

Targetting p0847 for GCC14 (explicit object parameter)

2023-06-07 Thread waffl3x via Gcc
I would like to boldly suggest implementing P0847 should be targeted at GCC14. In my anecdotal experiences, this feature is very important to people, and very important to myself, I believe it should be a priority. I am not suggesting this without offering to contribute, however because of my inex