hi...
i was seeing an infinite recursion in gen_lsm_tmp_name() in trunk.
it only happened with my code, when my __attribute__((restrict)) patch
is applied.
i dont really know how to reproduce it without it.
but the relevant place doesnt look like its supposed to be a
fallthrough.
see attached
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:45:06PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> I don't see a restrict qualified pointer here. Note that the
> >> restrict attribute would only disambiguate against those.
> >> Also I think you need the restrict attribute on the Mixer
> >> objects, not its members.
> >
> > s
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:49:29PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, torbenh wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Mixer mix __attribute__((restrict))
> >>
> >&
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:25:59PM +0100, torbenh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:27:15PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:39 PM, torbenh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:27:33PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >> On Tue, J
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:27:15PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:39 PM, torbenh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:27:33PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:03 PM, torbenh wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jan 05, 201
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:27:33PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:03 PM, torbenh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:46:30PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, torbenh wrote:
> >>
> >> The -fno-a
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:46:30PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, torbenh wrote:
>
> The -fno-alias-X things do not make much sense for user code (they
> have been historically used from Frontends). If restrict doesn't work
> for you (do
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:46:30PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, torbenh wrote:
> > __restrict__ is of no help here. which leads me to the question whats
> > the point of a restricted this pointer ? members of structs arent
> > unalia
hi...
i am new to this list.
i am trying to something like:
struct Ramp
{
float phase;
inline float process() { return phase++; }
} ramp;
void fill_buffer( float *buf, size_t nframes )
{
for( size_t i=0; i
