Re: [MPFR] Re: GNU MPFR 3.1.2 Release Candidate

2013-03-12 Thread sisyphus1
You have in your test output: Error in mpfr_vsprintf (s, "%.*Zi, %R*e, %Lf", ...); expected: "0010610209857723, -1.2345678875e+07, 0.032258" got: "0010610209857723, -1.2345678875e+07, 0.00" That "0.00" for the "%Lf" usually indicates that the "%Lf" formatting is not supporte

Re: [MPFR] Re: GNU MPFR 3.1.2 Release Candidate

2013-03-12 Thread sisyphus1
-Original Message- From: Dongsheng Song Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:25 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org ; m...@loria.fr Subject: [MPFR] Re: GNU MPFR 3.1.2 Release Candidate Test on x86_64-w64-mingw32, only tfprintf.exe, tprintf.exe, tsprintf.exe, and tstrtofr.exe FAILED, the other tests pa