. It also would work with user defined printf-like function
(which I use a lot).
On 20.03.20 11:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 07:16, jf wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a printf-like function lover. I always found that better than doing
something like out << "blabla : &qu
Hi all,
I'm a printf-like function lover. I always found that better than doing
something like out << "blabla : " << var1 << ", blabla" << etc.
Now, I use a lot of different platforms and to be portable, I'm supposed
to use PRIxxx constants for portability. For me that half-breaks the
readab
27;ll
need these built-in macros anyways. I also think C macros aren't
as useful as the C++ template-based constexpr magic.
Thanks,
JF
[0]: http://jfbastien.github.io/papers/P0152R1.html
[1]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17950
[2]: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17951