RE: [AVR] Target specific regression test causes virtual memory exhaustion

> -Original Message- > From: Georg-Johann Lay > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 1:05 PM > To: Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [AVR] Target specific regression test causes virtual memory > exhaustion > > Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb: > > On a 64 bit machin

RE: C99 Status - inttypes.h

> -Original Message- > From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:28 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joern Rennecke; Paulo J. Matos > Subject: Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h > > > Realistically, how man

RE: C99 Status - inttypes.h

> -Original Message- > From: Joern Rennecke [mailto:amyl...@spamcop.net] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:22 AM > To: Paulo J. Matos > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: C99 Status - inttypes.h > > I agree that trying to track every library there would be a maintenance > burden, but givin

RE: To Steering Committee: RFC for patch revert policy (PR48403, bootstrap broken on many targets)

> -Original Message- > From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:stevenb@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 6:24 AM > To: Bernd Schmidt > Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; GCC Mailing List; David Edelsohn; Benjamin Kosnik; > H.J. Lu > Subject: Re: To Steering Committee: RFC for patch revert policy (PR

RE: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity

> -Original Message- > From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com] > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 12:42 PM > To: Frank Ch. Eigler > Cc: H.J. Lu; Binutils; GCC Development; GDB > Subject: Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity > > f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:

RE: show size of stack needed by functions

> -Original Message- > From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 4:43 PM > To: sebastianspublicaddr...@googlemail.com > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joe Buck > Subject: Re: show size of stack needed by functions > > We have had something along these

RE: dragonegg in FSF gcc?

> -Original Message- > From: Manuel López-Ibáñez [mailto:lopeziba...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:27 AM > To: Dave Korn > Cc: Jack Howarth; Steven Bosscher; Duncan Sands; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: dragonegg in FSF gcc? > > The fact is that it is (perceived as) more

RE: AVR gives weird error with LTO

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:andrewhutchin...@cox.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:34 PM > To: Richard Guenther > Cc: Dave Korn; Rafael Espindola; GCC Development; Weddington, > Eric; Denis Chertykov > Subject: Re: AVR gives

RE: Approval as AVR maintainer

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:andrewhutchin...@cox.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:25 PM > To: Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; GCC Development; > Weddington, Eric > Subject: Approval as AVR maintainer > > How does one

RE: MPC version 0.8 released!

> -Original Message- > From: Kaveh R. Ghazi [mailto:gh...@caip.rutgers.edu] > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 10:40 AM > To: Gerald Pfeifer; dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com; > d...@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca; David Edelsohn; Weddington, Eric > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Sub

RE: MPC 0.7 officially released, please test and report your results!

> -Original Message- > From: Kaveh R. GHAZI [mailto:gh...@caip.rutgers.edu] > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:07 AM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: MPC 0.7 officially released, please test and report > your results! > > Hi, > > mpc-0.7 now has been released, > Please download

RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

> -Original Message- > From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:52 AM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; Basile STARYNKEVITCH; GCC Mailing List > Subject: RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers &g

RE: increasing the number of GCC reviewers

> -Original Message- > From: Joseph S. Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:51 PM > To: Ian Lance Taylor > Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH; GCC Mailing List > Subject: Re: increasing the number of GCC reviewers > > > At the human level I suspect it would he

Accessing called function attributes in FUNCTION_ARG macro

Hi All, This may be a dumb question, but I'm having difficulty finding the answer to this. I'm working on a back-end and I have a function being called for the FUNCTION_ARG macro, and in that function I need to find out the attributes of the called function as this will affect the calling conv

RE: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%.

> -Original Message- > From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:05 AM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [target.md]: Backend passes cause code bloat of +140%. > > Hi, > > I am trying to write some simple builtin functions for target avr. >

RE: Odd performance regression with -Os

> -Original Message- > From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:m...@codesourcery.com] > Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:51 AM > To: Andrew Haley > Cc: Eric Botcazou; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Georg-Johann Lay > Subject: Re: Odd performance regression with -Os > > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Eric Botcazou wrot

RE: [RFC] Remove -frtl-abstract-sequences in 4.5

> -Original Message- > From: Diego Novillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:56 AM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [RFC] Remove -frtl-abstract-sequences in 4.5 > > This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well > maintained. In terms of us

RE: New test is invalid for AVR

> -Original Message- > From: Dave Korn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 11:04 AM > To: Weddington, Eric; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: 'Andy Hutchinson'; 'Anatoly Sokolov'; 'Andreas Krebbel'; > [EMAIL PROTE

New test is invalid for AVR

Hi All, The new test gcc.c-torture/compile/20080806-1.c, added by Andreas Krebbel on 2008-08-06, causes 8 new test failures for the AVR target. This test is invalid for the AVR because the local array is too large for the AVR (64+ K). IIRC, for testing purposes the AVR target only allows a 2K s

RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP

> -Original Message- > From: Brian Dessent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:12 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Ralf Wildenhues; dju > Subject: Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 > in windows XP >

RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP

> -Original Message- > From: Brian Dessent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:35 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: Ralf Wildenhues; dju; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 > in windows XP > &g

RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP

> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 11:33 AM > To: dju > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 > in windows XP > > * dju wrote on Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:19:45AM CET: > > p

RE: RFC: GCC 4.4 criteria - add Fortran as primary language?

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:31 PM > To: Tim Prince > Cc: Joel Sherrill; Tobias Burnus; GCC > Subject: Re: RFC: GCC 4.4 criteria - add Fortran as primary language? > > Maybe there could be a "semi-primary" or "ex

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 3:39 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: FX Coudert; Gerald Pfeifer; Richard Guenther; Joerg > Wunsch; GCC Development; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; >

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 3:05 PM > To: Weddington, Eric; FX Coudert; Gerald Pfeifer; Richard > Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC Development; Denis Chertykov; > Anatoly Sokolov; Lamo, Jo Inge

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 1:18 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: FX Coudert; Gerald Pfeifer; Richard Guenther; Joerg > Wunsch; GCC Development; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; >

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: FX Coudert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:06 AM > To: Ralf Wildenhues > Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Richard Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC > Development; Weddington, Eric; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly > Sokolov;

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:05 AM > To: FX Coudert > Cc: Richard Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC Development; > Weddington, Eric; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Lamo, Jo Inge > Subject:

RE: bootstrap broken on mingw

> -Original Message- > From: FX Coudert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:00 AM > To: Ralf Wildenhues > Cc: Richard Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC Development; > Weddington, Eric; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Lamo, Jo Inge > Subject:

RE: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 12:34 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: GCC; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Joerg Wunsch; Lamo, Jo Inge > Subject: Re: AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snaps

AVR port broken on 4.3 20080215 snapshot

Hi All 4.3 20080215 snapshot fails to build for the AVR, whereas last week's snapshot 20080207 builds just fine. Filed as bug #35218: I know that the AVR target is neither a primary or secondary platform (though we'd like to pitch for secondary

RE: GCC 4.3 target deprecation proposals

> -Original Message- > From: Manuel López-Ibáñez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:35 AM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: Andrew Haley; NightStrike; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: GCC 4.3 target deprecation proposals > > On 23/0

RE: GCC 4.3 target deprecation proposals

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Haley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:19 AM > To: Manuel López-Ibáñez > Cc: NightStrike; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: GCC 4.3 target deprecation proposals > > > I agree that weighing the user base doesn't make any > p

RE: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever

> -Original Message- > From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:00 PM > To: GCC > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Regression count, and how to keep bugs around forever > > Maybe it is just me, but I find it very annoying to have to wade > th

RE: Function specific optimizations call for discussion

> -Original Message- > From: Michael Meissner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:58 PM > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Function specific optimizations call for discussion > > One of the things that I've been inte