On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:07 PM Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:31 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> How does this improve supply chain security if the signing happens
>> automagically rather than manually at points somebody actually
>> did extra verification?
>
>
> It works only
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:31 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
> How does this improve supply chain security if the signing happens
> automagically rather than manually at points somebody actually
> did extra verification?
It works only automatically if you have ssh-agent (and/or gpg-agent)
running. I
For my own projects I started /automatically/ signing all the git commits.
This is so far not that important for my private projects but it is
actually important for projects like gcc. It adds another layer of
security to the supply chain security.
My shell prompt (as many other people's as well)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 5:26 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
> One small request, I realise that Python 2 is dead, but I regularly
> bootstrap GCC
> on older machines that only have Python 2 installations. If possible (and
> it sounds
> plausible if the job is really quite simple) - it would be good to sup
I talked to Jonathan the other day about adding all the C++ library APIs to
the name hint file now that the size of the table is not really a concern
anymore.
Jonathan mentioned that he has to create and maintain a similar file for
the module support. It needs to list all the exported interfaces
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 11:26 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> On the other hand, that cast is still quite ugly.
Yes, there aren't yet any I/O functions defined for char8_t and therefore
that's the best we can do right now. I have all kinds of ugly macros to
high these casts.
> All string-related
>
I have a C++20+ code base which forces the program to run using an UTF-8
locale and then uses u8"" strings internally. This causes warnings with
-Wformat.
#include
int main()
{
printf((const char*) u8"test %d\n", 1);
return 0;
}
Compile with
g++ -std=gnu++20 -c -O -Wall t.cc
and you'll
I found myself with code similar to this:
struct base {
virtual void cb() = 0;
};
struct deriv final : public base {
void cb() final override { }
};
The question is about the second use of 'final'. Because the entire
class is declared final, should the individual function's annotation be
f
