Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-10 Thread Todd Vierling via Gcc
> This is all nice and good, but I would actually like to focus on realistic > targets (ie., ones which could be achieved significantly before 2038... :o) Right — there are distro releases shipping over the next few years which will still be deployed in production in 2038, so the clock is actuall

Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-05 Thread Todd Vierling via Gcc
> One possible improvement would be to append "t32" if you want 32-bit > time_t, instead of appending "t64" for 64-bit time_t. Versioned symbols in glibc should mean that old binaries will still run (even if they misbehave when they look at the system time), just like with most previous ABI chan