Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We've shipped our version. Richard's version has presumably also
> > shipped.
>
> Right.
>
> > We did negotiate the ABI changes with MTI; this is not quite
> > as good as doing it in full view, but it was the best we co
David Daney wrote:
> Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, David Daney wrote:
>>> Currently, I (and thus GCC 4.3) am assuming that Linux emulates 'll',
>>> 'sc' and
>>> 'sync', If sync is not emulated, we would need to adjust the code
>>> generation
>>> so that it is not emitted on ISA
David Daney wrote:
> Richard,
>
> There seems to be a small problem with the MIPS atomic memory operations
> patch I recently committed
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01290.html), in that on a
> dual CPU machine it does not quite work.
>
> You can look at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
