Hi !
I've decided to mail to gcc mail list, since I've could find best programming
language experts in here.
I'm starting to design a new language called 'Simple language'.
I'm searching for people for discussing ideas, designing, brainstorming and/or
making pc side code.
Here is web site: htt
Hi !
I'm wondering whether cxx-reflection branch is still active or alive ?
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/projects/cxx-reflection/
I've already tried to contact Gabriel Dos Reis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but received no responce from him.
Based on what I have found on web pages and in forums l
Hi !
Tried to compile gcc 4.1.1 (and .2) under windows / cygwin environment - and
end up with error:
In file included from ../.././gcc/gcc.c:134:
./configargs.h:2: error: missing terminating " character
./configargs.h:3: error: missing terminating " character
./configargs.h:4: error: parse error
> One advantage of most computer languages (with the arguable exception of
> C, but even it has preprocessor macros) is that they provide high-level
> constructs that make it easier to write programs.
Constructors and destructors are quite simple functions which are
executed at particular time.
> As for what is best to do, I don't know. But I do know that complexity is
> bad, and that GCC is very complex. You are absolutely right about there
> being hard limits. There are trade-offs required. Whether the current and
> ongoing trade-offs are the right ones is an open question.
I'm comp
Hi !
I would like to port IDL language (language for
describing the interfaces) to gcc and also create a
several backend compilers. Since the interface is not
complete implementation it wont be possible to produce
final executable after IDL parsing. Also as far as I
can see IDL is heavily reduced
