> On Nov 12, 2024, at 01:51, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> Am Montag, dem 07.10.2024 um 15:14 + schrieb Qing Zhao:
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2024, at 10:13, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Joseph Myers:
> The real qu
> On Oct 7, 2024, at 11:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:14:22PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> Consider the qsort case. My understanding was that the paper is making
>>> typedef int (*cmpfn) (const void *, const void *);
>>> qsort (NULL, 0, 1, (cmpfn) NULL);
>>> valid (but
> On Oct 7, 2024, at 10:13, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Joseph Myers:
>>
>>> The real question is how to achieve optimal warnings in the absence of the
>>> attribute. Should we have a variant of the nonnull attribute t
> On Aug 14, 2023, at 2:41 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 8:30 PM Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Structures with flexible array members have restrictions about being
>> used in arrays or within other structures, as the size of the enclosing
Hi, Jan,
I did a little search online and also into GCC’s documentation, and found the
following
several options to support parallel processing and multi-threading during
profiling collection:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.5.0/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html
-fprofile-dir=path and
> On May 18, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Martin Uecker via Gcc wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:14 PM Kees Cook via Gcc wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:53:52PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2023, Kees Cook via Gcc wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:29:
> On May 12, 2023, at 2:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:14 PM Kees Cook via Gcc wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:53:52PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 May 2023, Kees Cook via Gcc wrote:
>>>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:29:10PM +0200,
