rface, the warning disapears. It does also not happen
if you write
#pragma implementation "undefined_constructor.hpp"
in the cpp file.
It apears to be triggered when using a template class with a base class.
I had similar warnings for a missing destructor.
Peter Soetens
#pragma inte
instructions, which is
still many times faster than locking/unlocking a mutex.
Peter
On Saturday 12 February 2005 11:42, Marcel Cox wrote:
> Peter Soetens wrote:
> > I was wondering why the above gcc parameter does not enable the use
> > of the fst/fld opcodes for pentium processor
f: dd 45 f8fldQWORD PTR [ebp-8]
> >12: dd 5d f0 fstp QWORD PTR [ebp-16]
> > }
> >15: c9 leave
> >16: c3 ret
> >
> > FLD and FSTP are available on all pentium processors.
> > Is there a chance, for other reasons, that my code will
not run on a pentium
if I use -march=i686 ?
Thanks for any help on this,
Peter
--
----
Peter Soetens, Research Assistant http://www.orocos.org
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Division Production
