Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

2005-04-19 Thread Peter FELECAN
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > > > > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > > > > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > > > > >

Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

2005-04-19 Thread Peter FELECAN
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > > Currently the libgcc_s.so library has the same version in 3.4 and 4.0, > > i.e libgcc_s.so.1 (SONAME = libgcc_s.so.1). > > > > Is this as expected? >

libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

2005-04-19 Thread Peter FELECAN
4 and 4.0 cohabitation? --- the 2 versions are installed in separate directories, however, the run-path, used by the dynamic linker, containing libgcc_s.so is shared. If someone can give me a pointer toward the relevant documentation I would be grateful. -- Peter FELECAN