On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Vincent R. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:58:13 +0200, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>>> I'm a bit amazed that the prototype for VirtualProtect() is
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:58:13 +0200, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> I'm a bit amazed that the prototype for VirtualProtect() is known to the
>> compiler but the definition of DWORD is not.. In any case, it should be
>> fixe
I'm a bit amazed that the prototype for VirtualProtect() is known to the
compiler but the definition of DWORD is not.. In any case, it should be
fixed easily by changing DWORD into unsigned int which is what a
DWORD is always defined as. And PR 39063 is still open anyway.
--
Ozkan
