On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:32:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 13 April 2006 13:37, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:34:10PM +0800, Ching-Hua Chang wrote:
> >> We had ported gcc-3.4.2 to our own RISC, and meet a strange
> >> case in optimization
ouple weeks ago to the list, but never got any responses.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-04/msg00054.html
mh
--
Martin Hicks || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP/GnuPG: 0x4C7F2BEE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:31:19AM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've run into a piece of code on ppc405 that does the wrong thing when a
> function is automatically inlined. I don't really do ppc asm so I
> haven't been able to isolate what exa
fine if I
leave the static, but also add the 'noinline' function attribute.
I've posted "objdump -dS" output for post/cpu/b.o with and without
cpu_post_test_bc() declared as static at:
http://www.bork.org/~mort/ppcstatic/
Any hints appreciated. Let me know if any
