this mirror seems to be stuck at versions around late 2009.
regards, mark hahn.
omment in this thread so far has been that libm
might somehow rely on EP (ie can't use the _FPU_SET_CW workaround).
which code is this? I'd guess it might be related to using series
approximations, and the code could either set CW or accept 64b results.
regards, mark hahn.
> How do you suppose we fix the three-fold run-time performance
> regressions I and other people see for their scientific code?
right! in other words, do you want 4.0 to be a developer-only release,
or do you want anyone to use it to compile actual applications?
at least in my world, compilers
