Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler

2005-07-01 Thread Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
Daniel Berlin wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:17 -0700, James E Wilson wrote: Their web pages primarily talk about the 64-bit performance on AMD systems. Maybe they aren't well tuned for 32-bit performance and/or Intel parts. Anyways, from what Daniel Berlin mentioned, it may be that the t

Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler

2005-07-01 Thread Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
Vladimir Makarov wrote: I heard a lot of this compiler and expected a better results for it. Using -O2 -mtune=nocona for gcc4 and -O2 -mtune=em64t for open64 on em64t machine in 32-bit mode, I found preliminarily that pathscale compiler generates about 10% worse and 30% larger code (text segm

Pro64-based GPLed compiler

2005-06-29 Thread Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
Hello everyone, In 2000, SGI released a GPLed compiler suite. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-05/threads.html#00632 http://web.archive.org/www.sgi.com/newsroom/press_releases/2000/may/linux-ia64.html I've taken PathScale's source tree (they've removed the IA-64 code generator, and added an x86/A