[AMD Public Use]
> That's deliberate, so that we can use the same x86-* names for 32-bit library
> selection (once we define matching micro-architecture levels there).
Understood.
> If numbers are out, what should we use instead?
> x86-sse4, x86-avx2, x86-avx512? Would that work?
Yes please,
[AMD Public Use]
Hi Floarian,
> I'm including a proposal for the levels below. I use single letters for
> them, but I expect that the concrete implementation of this proposal will use
> names like “x86-100”, “x86-101”, like in the glibc patch referenced above.
> (But we can discuss other app
