On 10/17/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Macy Gasp writes:
> > On 10/17/07, Macy Gasp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/17/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Macy Gasp writes:
> > >
On 10/17/07, Macy Gasp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Macy Gasp writes:
> > > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Read the Fine Manual:
> >
> >
> >int vsprintf(char *str, const cha
On 10/17/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Macy Gasp writes:
> > Hi everybody,
>
> Read the Fine Manual:
>
>
>int vsprintf(char *str, const char *format, va_list ap);
>
>The functions vprintf(), vfprintf(), vsprintf(), vsnpri
Hi everybody,
I'm experiencing a weird behaviour when using va_list with gcc 4.1.2
on a x86_64 linux distribution.
Below is my test program (yes, I know about the possible buffer
overflows but please, bear with me, this is just a proof of concept):
#include
#include
int var(const char* fmt, .