gcc 4.8.3 / PR60901

PR60901 is listed in the bug fixes for gcc 4.8.3, but I don't see the patch ever applied to the 4_8 branch in the bug report, and 4.8.3 is listed as known to fail. -Kenny

multiversioning page update?

http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning  says "This support has been checked in to trunk and should be available when GCC 4.8 is released." Since 4.8 has been released, and lists multiversioning support in the release notes, should the page be updated to reflect this? -Kenny

4.8 status on front page

On http://gcc.gnu.org, the 4.8 status is still pointing to the original release note from 4.8.0. Shouldn't it be updated to the status report on 2013-05-07 ? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00074.html -Kenny

Re: gcc 4.7.3 plans?

> > When will 4.7.3 be released? > > When it's released. > > Why are you so interested in a date? > > Richard. Speaking only for myself, I'm trying to get a few projects migrated to gcc 4.7 from 4.6.3. I'd strongly prefer to move to an official version. Many bugs that impact these projects

more 4.7 backports?

Last month I sent a list of bugreports that were 4.7 regressions, but had patches which fixed them for 4.8. It looks like ~7 of these had been backported and 10 more bugreports now exist with potential for backporting as well. Here are my rough notes: backported: 44061 - diagnostic 54767 - wr

gcc 4.8 status not reflected on website

http://gcc.gnu.org still shows: Development: GCC 4.8.0 (changes, release criteria) Status: 2013-01-08 but there just was a status update: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-02/msg00177.html Any word on 4.7.3 plans? If 4.8 is going RC in March, can 4.7.3 be far away? thanks, -Kenny

more 4.7 backports?

Are there plans to do more backports of regression fixes to 4.7 before 4.7.3? Here is a list of bugs that have patches applied to 4.8 to fix the bug, but which are still listed as 4.7 regressions: 48189 - ice-on-valid 55018 - wrong-code 54563 - ice-on-valid - already backported? 54974 - [arm] wr

gcc 4.7.3 plans?

There have been quite a few fixes on the 4.7 branch since 4.7.2 was released 4 months ago and several of the remaining regression bugs have fixes in trunk. What are the plans for 4.7.3? thanks, -Kenny

plans for 'Rvalue references for *this' support?

>From http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, I see that this seems to be the >only major core-language feature missing from c++11 support. And from >http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html I see that clang does support it. I see the note saying that it was being worked on, but this note had been

when will gcc 4.4.5 be?

"GCC 4.4.5 is planned roughly for end of July, unless some severe issue forces us to release it earlier." - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-04/msg01018.html Is a 4.4.5 release still planned? When? thanks, -Kenny

C++0x lambdas in 4.5?

Will the lambda branch be merged into 4.5? -Kenny

Re: optimizing predictable branches on x86

> At least on x86 it should also be a good idea to know which way > the branch is going to go, because it doesn't have explicit branch > hints, you really want to be able to optimize the cold branch > predictor case if converting from cmov to conditional branches. x86 as of Pentium 4 does have bra

4.1 status?

What is the status of the 4.1 branch? Any word on 4.1.2? thanks, -Kenny __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com