Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-04 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
> > + if (verbose) { > > + task_lock(p); > > We need to be careful with which locks we take on the oom-killer path, > because it can be called by code which already holds locks. But I > expect task_lock() will be OK. Sure. task_lock() is already used various oom path. I think this is

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-04 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
kill process 2341 (memhog) score 527276 or a child Killed process 2341 (memhog) vsz:1054552kB, anon-rss:970588kB, file-rss:4kB ======= ^ | here Signed-off-by:

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-03 Thread KOSAKI Motohiro
> Hello, > I'm not sure how to handle this, > while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source > I get this with the default compiling options, > as well as custom: > > > [ 532.942324] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, > oom_adj=0 > [ 532.942330] Pid: 16002, comm: cc1plus Tainted: P >