Re: Possible range based 'for' bug

2015-06-21 Thread Julian Klappenbach
in() / end(), I would assume that converting the range-for logic to work with references would cause some nasty side-effects. Pity. On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 21 June 2015 at 16:56, Julian Klappenbach wrote: >> Version info: >> >> Configured

Re: Possible range based 'for' bug

2015-06-21 Thread Julian Klappenbach
Version info: Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0 Thread model: posix I'm using the default build provided by bre