On Oct 20, 2012, at 20:23 , Richard Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jordan Rose wrote:
>>> While throwing things out there, why not just optionally allow constexpr
>>> functions
On Oct 19, 2012, at 23:27 , Andy Gibbs wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 7:50 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>> [...snip...] Let me hypothesize a different interface:
>>
>> This stays the same...
>> constexpr int constexpr_strncmp(const char *p, const char *q, size_t n) {
>> return !n ? 0 : *
