Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-23 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Robert Dewar wrote: Jonathan Turkanis wrote: Jonathan Turkanis wrote: > I've asked this question twice at gcc-help, but got no response. I didn't even get a sarcastic response! :-P Well there is no guaranteed response, given this is a volunteer activity. You can't com

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-23 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Dave Korn wrote: > Original Message >> From: Jonathan Turkanis >> Sent: 23 September 2005 01:43 >> If the implication is that users should grep the source code before asking >> questions, that's not a reasonable expectation. > It is actuall

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-22 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Mike Stump wrote: On Thursday, September 22, 2005, at 05:42 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote: Looking into it further, I've found: From Bugzilla Bug 23628: > --- Additional Comment #9 From Mat Marcus 2005-08-29 20:44 [reply] > Sorry, I was a bit sloppy--I didn't remove

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-22 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Hank Kester wrote: On 9/22/05, Jonathan Turkanis wrote: >> > M-x grep VISIBILITY tells you the answer. >> What are you grepping? > Why, the source code to gcc of course. Let's go back a bit: Mike Stump wrote: If the implication is that users should grep

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-22 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Jonathan Turkanis writes: I'm getting tired of this. You assumed I'm must have meant something else than what I plainly asked; once I mentioned that I was writing a book, you realized I really meant what I said. That's pretty much it, yes. Many year

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-22 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Mike Stump wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2005, at 09:13 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote: > >> > Telling users to supply that flag is useless. It is the default. >> >> It's advertised as the default, but the threads I cited in my last post suggest > Th

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-21 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Geoffrey Keating wrote: > Jonathan Turkanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Geoffrey Keating wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Turkanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> If you tell us what the real question is, maybe we can answer that one. >> &g

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-21 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Mike Stump wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote: > >> > I think I can give you an answer which is completely correct and yet >> > completely useless: -fvisibility=default is supported on every platform. >> >> Than

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-16 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Geoffrey Keating wrote: > Jonathan Turkanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On which platforms is the -fvisibility option supported? The GCC docs >> here (http://tinyurl.com/99wc8) suggest that it is a subset of ELF >> platforms. Is that correct? > I think I c

Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-14 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Mike Stump wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote: > >> I've asked this question twice at gcc-help, but got no response. >> On which platforms is the -fvisibility option supported? > autoconf will answer this question for you, please use it.

On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

2005-09-14 Thread Jonathan Turkanis
Hi, I've asked this question twice at gcc-help, but got no response. On which platforms is the -fvisibility option supported? The GCC docs here (http://tinyurl.com/99wc8) suggest that it is a subset of ELF platforms. Is that correct? -- Jonathan Turkanis www.kangaroologic.com