Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 > > language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. > > It should probably be https:

More links in release change list

2011-03-26 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
As I read through http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html, it seems to me that would be quite useful (and interesting) to be able to see more information for each of the changes. Links to relevant discussion, bugs, papers or patches/commits would make it far easier to understand the substance o

Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5

2010-06-24 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
On 25/06/10 06:39, Richard Guenther wrote: > There are btw. some bugs wrt accounting of functions called once > being inlined in 4.5 which were fixed on trunk which allow extra > inlining. > Are these changes likely to make it onto the 4.5 branch and into (say) 4.5.1? j.

Re: Volunteer for a Beginner's Project: Header-Header Interdependencies

2008-02-10 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
NightStrike wrote: What is gcc's irc server? #gcc on irc.oftc.net

Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls

2007-12-17 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are there any comments about the name, semantics, or usefulness of this > extension? > Sounds very useful for SPU code. I look forward to trying it out. Toying with the idea, the following seems like a potentially useful C++ form of the proposed extension : struct

Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Michael Meissner wrote: One of the things that I've been interested in is adding support to GCC to compile individual functions with specific target options. I first presented a draft at the Google mini-summit, and then another draft at the GCC developer summit last July. ... The proposal is a

Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue

2007-09-23 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Jonathan Wakely wrote: I believe Andrew's right and the strcpy case is valid, but you do have a point. I think this should be rejected: struct A { int i; }; struct B { A get() { return A(); } }; int main () { B b; b.get().i = 0; // int& error = b.get().i; } What about somethin

Re: Linker problems: dependencies with .a file not resolved?

2007-02-28 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Christian Convey wrote: But the symbol really does appear to be in the archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nm --demangle /home/cjc/csc583-svn/uriVisionLib/trunk/Development/Source/C++/liburiVision.a | grep "uriVideoSources::ImageReader_gen::getFrame" U uriVideoSources::ImageReader_gen::getF

Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file?

2007-02-27 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Christian Convey wrote: In function `uriVideoSources::ImageReader::getFrame(bool, uriBase::RasterImage*)': ImageReader.cpp:(.text+0x90): undefined reference to If the missing reference is to `uriVideoSources::ImageReader_gen::getFrame_(bool, uriBase::RasterImage*)' Why do you grep for ou