On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> There's no "for a long time" here. The ABI does not allow us to emit these
>> symbols with non-coalescing linkage. We're not going to break ABI
>> just because people didn't consider a particular code pattern when they
>> hacked in devirtual
On Jun 29, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> But that's pervasively true in C++ — the linker has to eliminate duplicates
>> all the time. Idiomatic C++ code ends up plunking down hundreds, if
>> not thousands, of inline functions in every single translation unit. This is
>> already a
On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:13:47PM -0400, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> [ problem with visibility for bar::~bar for testcase ]
>> $ cat test.h
>> struct foo {
>> virtual ~foo();
>> };
>> struct bar : public foo {
>> virtual void zed();
>> };
>> $ cat de
