On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Tim Prince:
All CPUs still in production are at least SSE3 capable, unless someone
can come up with one of which I'm not aware.
What about some of the AMD Geode processors?
These only support a subset of SSE1, according to
http://wiki.laptop.or
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stand-alone, non-Web-based app. that I'd like to
distribute as a .exe with some database files, to a layman
audience, and I'd like to avoid issues of JRE distribution and
compatibility, etc. So I'm hoping someone, somewhere, has
written a rep
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, skaller wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:46 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 07:39:33AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The only way I can interpret your comments is that you are assuming
that all TLS is Global Dynamic (e.g., accessed from a dlopen'ed sh
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, tbp wrote:
On 7/19/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I always used the array variant, but you should be able to do
[snip]
if you need to (why does the array form not work for you?)
Because if you bench in some non trivial program, on x86/x86-64 at
lea
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, David Nicol wrote:
One imagines that one would construct a virtual machine architecture
framework and then write a back-end that would generate "machine code"
for that virtual machine, which would be a subset of ANSI C.
Hey-presto, you then have a butt-ugly anything-to-ANSI
Hi everyone.
I'm interested in extending g++ to support Java-style anonymous classes,
and I thought I would ping this list in case anyone here has any relevant
advice, experience, etc..
For those who don't know what I'm talking about, here's an example:
[snippet]
class Callback {
public:
