On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:52:40PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:08:43PM -0500, Jason Bucata wrote:
> > Would it help to report some others [regressions]?
> > I might have time later this week to
> > work on some of the others, especially now that I have
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:46:38AM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Jason Bucata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> You should try and isolate a single BYTEmark test which shows the
> >> biggest regression. It's better if you manage to pack the whole test
> &
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:04:37AM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> You should try and isolate a single BYTEmark test which shows the biggest
> regression. It's better if you manage to pack the whole test as a single
> preprocessed source file. Theoretically, this file should be compilable and
> linka
Is anybody collecting information on performance regressions in 4.0.0 (vs.
3.4.3)? I've got some results on POVRAY and BYTEmark, and BYTEmark saw some
performance regression, particularly with profiled optimization
(-fprofile-{generate,use}):
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-329765.htm
