On Sun, 29 May 2005, Ross Smith wrote:
On Sunday, 29 May 2005 03:17, Uros Bizjak wrote:
There is no problem that Bugzilla is un-intuitive, it is far from
that. The users don't fill bugreports because they are afraid of
filling an invalid report or a duplicate.
I strongly suspect you're mista
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
[...]
shortly. All those posted (at least this month) seem to get posted with
subject lines which do not match the normal form produced by test_summary
and so don't get so readily found by my script which counts how many test
results postings the
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 16, 2005, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After all, you can buy from Dell today a 2.4GHz machine with a 17"
monitor, DVD drive, and 256Meg memory for $299 complete. Sure, some
people cannot even afford that, but it is not clear that the gc
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
Why isn't --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 sufficient to stop this?
Because you assigned that to $LANGOPT (no trailing 'S'), but the configure
command line has it spelt as $LANGOPTS (note trailing 'S'!), so it didn't
_actually_ get passed to the configure command
I'm trying to bring an old machine (Solaris 2.5.1, Sparc, Sun4c) up
to date. It has been my experience that I can't build GCC with a
version of gcc that is too old. Thus, to reach gcc-3.4.3 I'm trying
to build gcc-3.3.5 first, with 2.95.2
I have a build script
#!/bin/sh -x
PATH=/bin:/usr/sbin:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
For ld, at least, --no-keep-memory. Normally it makes things run
slower, but that may not actually be the case for libjava.
Another suggestion, even though my last one sank without trace :-)
There is a lot to read through to find out things like this,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
If you can include the preprocessed file and profiler output from cc1
running on your system, there is a chance that this can be addressed.
GCC comes with a test suite and a means for submitting results. May
I suggest that it might be useful to have a t
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
If "*-*-solaris2*" should appear as/in the "name" attribute of an ,
prepending a name start character is not enough, because this attribute
is of type NMTOKEN. Therefore it cannot contain * at all.
...if we are abs
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
Sent: 12 April 2005 14:49
Wouldn't it be an awful lot easier to just
A) apply the previously-mentioned fix to toplevel?
If I knew where it was mentioned, probably.
Earlier in this very thread, D
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Ray Holme
Sent: 12 April 2005 13:42
the install-sh is always referenced in the parent directory.
(../install-sh)
so for all the first level directories in the install directory - one copy
at the top will do.
now for sub-sub direc
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote:
But to get the definitions we are after it should be looking in sys,
No, is not directly included, only .
Oh, I see. And I think I now understand what the
--with-local-prefix does, so I'll let you
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Ray Holme wrote:
Many thanks to all for the lessons on how NOT to make things you don't
want.
After 56 hours teh full make bootstrap finished - make install failed
miserable as
install.sh was not where it belonged - so I copied the SRCDIR install.sh
in and that made the top leve
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:11:25PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
I don't know about the utility of example scripts in general, but for
this specific case, I strongly feel autoconf should automatically
detect this and reexec the configure script under /bin/ksh.
Is
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > 1) years ago GCC took about 2 hours to compile, last year it was 26
> > hours for me, this year I just surpassed 48 hours and it is still
[...]
>
> Configure with --disable-libgcj. I even considered making this the
[...]
Not necessary.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote:
But to get the definitions we are after it should be looking in sys,
No, is not directly included, only .
Oh, I see. And I think I now understand what the
--with-local-prefix does, so I'll let you know the results in a few
hours. I've put --with-local-pr
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This is totally unlike /usr/include/link.h, but I don't see why it
And unlike /usr/include/sys/link.h
should be picked up by what must be a directive such as
#include
So I think this file isn't relevant.
It is relevant, the local-prefix directory is searche
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Here's what I get with -H:
Sorry? -H applied to what command?
The GCC command line you pasted.
Oh ... "list included files"...
sh-2.05$ chmod u+x !$
chmod u+x tmp-gcc-cmd.bash
bash-2.05$ ./!$
./tmp-gcc-cmd.bash
+ /export/home/Scratch/hgs/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote:
/export/home/Scratch/hgs/gcc-3.4.3/boehm-gc/dyn_load.c:110: error: syntax
error before "_DYNAMIC"
/export/home/Scratch/hgs/gcc-3.4.3/boehm-gc/dyn_load.c:111: error:
`Elf32_Dyn' undeclared (first use in this function)
Elf32_Dyn is supposed to be defined in /u
I've STW for this but can't see others with the same problem. I'm
getting:
[...]
/bin/bash ./libtool --mode=compile /export/home/Scratch/hgs/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/home/Scratch/hgs/gcc-build/gcc/
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/bin/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/lib/
-isyste
19 matches
Mail list logo
