On Thursday 01 September 2005 19:16, James E Wilson wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why you are asking? Since target flag macros are
> target dependent, there is no particular need for them to be consistent
> across different targets.
I was checking to see exactly what differences configuring a cur
It appears that the ia64 port introduced the internal define
MASK_GNU_AS that is used the same was as the historical MASK_GAS
define. There was some discussion of this about 5 years ago as part
of a larger discussion about possible user level changes.
It would seem to be a pretty simple change to
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 21:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Ask me if you want either set of code.
Sure, I'd like to take a look at it.
> If you want to work on anything without duplicating effort, it behooves
> _you_ to discuss it on the mailing lists first.
Agreed. I've just recently started l
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 10:55, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> better support for inline functions, which is already on the gdb
> roadmap
Where's the roadmap? I'm just starting to look at this very issue
and would be good to know what is planned or in progress.
Thanks.
-Fred
