--- DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>写道:
>
> > I think this is caused by a typos error in libiberty/pexecute.c. Doesn't
> anyone
> > else see it?
>
> Already fixed.
>
OK. Thanks.
Feng Wang
__
ex, idx, vector))
{
- free (vector)
+ free (vector);
return -1;
}
*status = vector[pid];
Best Regards,
Feng Wang
--
Creative Compiler Research Group
k that this is way too strong. Of the outstanding PR19292 "bugs":
>
>
> 22290 Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher - we seem to
> have a fix for this(?)
>
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-10/msg00194.html
But has not been reviewed.
o-host.h:250:1: warning: "HAVE_DECL_GETOPT" redefined
../../gcc/gcc/tsystem.h:40:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
defi
[snip]
Best Regards,
Feng Wang
--
Creative Compiler Research Group,
National University of Defense Technology, China.
__
赶快注册雅虎超大容量免费邮箱?
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
--- "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>写道:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Feng Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to write a testcase. The compiler gives two separated warnings on
> one
> > statement. How to write this with Dejagnu?
> &g
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Quoting Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to write a testcase. The compiler gives two separated warnings on
> one
> > statement. How to write this with Dejagnu?
>
> If the loci are different, i
of the statment.
But alwarys get excess errors.
The testcase is used to test one patch for gfortran. Sorry have no more
concrete program for this question.
Best Regards,
Feng Wang
--
Creative Compiler Research Group,
National
Hello,
I have received the confirming mail for my application on "write after
approval". Thanks, all.
p.s. Steve, I think I can commit the patch for PR18827 myself. If you reviewed,
please notify me.
Best Regards,
Feng Wang
_
Do
